<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; relocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/relocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Brexit &#8211; Family Law Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first thoughts on Brexit news today was sympathy for parents whose children have been removed to other European countries following leave to remove decisions. The decision last night will be causing them uncertainty and anxiety. One of the the best EU regulations from a family law perspective  (or bureaucracy that was forced upon us&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re C (Older Children: Relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1298</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Older Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(Older Children: Relocation)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civ 1298]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case related to an application for leave to remove in respect of two teenagers. One being under 16, the other aged 17. The appellate court refused appeal against the recorder´s decision to refuse leave to remove in respect of the younger teen, despite their expressing their wish to relocate. The underlying reason was that&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave to Remove Guidance for the non-relocating parent</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ltr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the weekend I was asked what goes through my head (not the first time in the last week) when working on arguments in leave to remove cases. The question &#8220;are they very difficult to stop&#8221; raises the response &#8220;no, but you can&#8217;t hope to just walk into court without detailed preparation and get a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In today&#8217;s Daily Mail &#8211; The fathers who only see their children on a computer screen</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/in-todays-daily-mail-the-fathers-who-only-see-their-children-on-a-computer-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/in-todays-daily-mail-the-fathers-who-only-see-their-children-on-a-computer-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCM in the Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Parenting TIme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indirect contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you missed the Daily Mail article today on the limitations of Skype as a source of contact, you can read it via the link below: The fathers who only see their children on a computer screen It&#8217;s worth remembering that some mums are affected by this too. Regardless of gender, all of their children&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/in-todays-daily-mail-the-fathers-who-only-see-their-children-on-a-computer-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
