<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; Re C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/re-c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Family Law Week: Excellent Analysis of Internal Relocation Law</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Deborah Eaton QC and Stephen Jarmain, barrister, both of 1 King’s Bench Walk, explain the lessons to be learned from the important Court of Appeal judgment on internal relocation in which the authors represented the mother.&#8221; A must read for anyone who becomes involved in cases involving internal relocation. Add it to your bookmarks! Family&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re C (Older Children: Relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1298</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Older Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(Older Children: Relocation)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civ 1298]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case related to an application for leave to remove in respect of two teenagers. One being under 16, the other aged 17. The appellate court refused appeal against the recorder´s decision to refuse leave to remove in respect of the younger teen, despite their expressing their wish to relocate. The underlying reason was that&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
