<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; private</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/private/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>LIP Friendly Family Law Orders &#8211; Content and Resources</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lip-friendly-family-law-orders-content-resources/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lip-friendly-family-law-orders-content-resources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 13:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Draft Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago I shared an update that the President of the Family Court has announced the production of draft family law orders better suited to Litigants-in-Person (parents who represent themselves in court). The intentions are positive and include better consistency across the court service and wording aimed at the non-technical. Hopefully the new&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lip-friendly-family-law-orders-content-resources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failures in Judicial Case Allocation and Gatekeeping</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen a number of cases recently where the courts are failing to follow rules in relation to case allocation. Some of the worst examples include: leave to remove cases (where one parent seeks to remove the children abroad). complex cases previously heard in senior courts ending up heard by magistrates who fail to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
