<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; parental alienation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/parental-alienation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation and Reform &#8211; Asking the Right Questions</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was pleasant to read Anthony Douglas, Chief Executive of CAFCASS, acknowledging that parental alienation was a form of child abuse in this week&#8217;s Telegraph. Pleasant&#8230; although being honest the main emotion was irritation, as I read an article which did little and said less. Catch up! Alienation is recognised&#8230; this isn&#8217;t news. If you&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parenting Stereotypes and Alienation</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Assessent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared Living Arrangements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Jennifer Hardman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A powerful talk by Dr Jennifer Hardman on parenting stereotypes and alienation, given at an independently organised TED talks event. Dr. Harman is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Colorado State University and is the Program Coordinator for the Applied Social &#38; Health Psychology Program. A number of interesting features for me. Parenting stereotypes; The&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial Judgment &#8216;Wholly Lacking&#8217; in Intractable Contact Cases</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/judicial-judgment-wholly-lacking-in-intractable-contact-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/judicial-judgment-wholly-lacking-in-intractable-contact-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 04:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWCA Civ 1315]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F (Children)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inadequate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F (Children) [2015] EWCA Civ 1315 is yet another case involving alienation where the handling of the case by the lower court was &#8216;wholly inadequate&#8216;. Not my opinion (actually it is, and I agree&#8230;), but that of the Lords Justice who heard the appeal. The case highlights the failings which are increasingly commonplace in the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/judicial-judgment-wholly-lacking-in-intractable-contact-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposals for the Reform of Intractable Contact Dispute Law</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families Need Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable contact dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice direction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir james munby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last September I had the opportunity to write a paper on the reform of private family law and specifically related to contact enforcement. The paper was presented to Sir James Munby, President of the Family Court, by officers of Families Need Fathers who had been offered a continuing dialogue by him following his presentation to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failings in Intractable Contact Cases Continue</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When intractable contact dispute cases fail to be resolved there are common reasons, and ones which involve how the cases are managed by the court and professionals involved in proceedings. Some of those cases are salvageable, while for others the long length of proceedings acts as a bar to the court entertaining a different approach.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alienation, Strategies and Pessimism</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/alienation-strategies-and-pessimism/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/alienation-strategies-and-pessimism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 07:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implacable hostility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable contact disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 991]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are strategies which aid in successful resolution of cases involving implacable hostility and children being cognitively manipulated to oppose contact (commonly referred to as parental alienation). While there is case law to support these strategies, they&#8217;re not rocket science (but just because they&#8217;re common-sense doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t sometimes need spelling out): it is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/alienation-strategies-and-pessimism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental alienation counsellor Karen Woodall sanctioned for malpractice</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-counsellor-sanctioned-for-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-counsellor-sanctioned-for-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 04:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british association for counselling and psychotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counsellor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[findings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karen woodall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) has published findings of professional malpractice in respect of Karen Woodall, a therapist specialising in work with families where parental alienation is a factor. The BACP is the UK&#8217;s largest professional body representing 40,000 counsellor/therapist members. Parts of the complaint (upheld) relate to Ms Woodall providing a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-counsellor-sanctioned-for-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re H-B [2015] EWCA Civ 389 &#8211; Disagreeing with Black LJ and Munby</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-h-b-2015-ewca-civ-389-disagreeing-with-black-lj-and-munby/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-h-b-2015-ewca-civ-389-disagreeing-with-black-lj-and-munby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implacable hostility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re H-B [2015] EWCA Civ 389]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s rare that I disagree with a judgment from the President of the Family Court or Lady Justice Black. This however is one such occasion where I feel their judgment is wide of the mark. There are some fundamental failures in the management of this parental alienation case. The case details are depressingly common: an&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-h-b-2015-ewca-civ-389-disagreeing-with-black-lj-and-munby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to our new website</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/welcome-to-our-new-website/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/welcome-to-our-new-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more and more people move to accessing online content via smartphones and tablets, a change to a very mobile friendly format was necessary. The new site operates seamlessly across all platforms and all devices. Not just improved accessibility, but we&#8217;ve plenty of new content for you! Our Free Family Law App Yes, it&#8217;s still&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/welcome-to-our-new-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation &#8211; The Need for Consistency</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers of the court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wishes and feelings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Telegraph today ran an article on parental alienation headlined &#8220;We must stop turning children against divorced fathers&#8220;. It&#8217;s an area of interest for me, having worked on numerous cases where parental alienation was a factor, and having seen slow change in the courts on how parental alienation is considered and approached. People still say&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
