<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; internal relocation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/internal-relocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Family Law Week: Excellent Analysis of Internal Relocation Law</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Deborah Eaton QC and Stephen Jarmain, barrister, both of 1 King’s Bench Walk, explain the lessons to be learned from the important Court of Appeal judgment on internal relocation in which the authors represented the mother.&#8221; A must read for anyone who becomes involved in cases involving internal relocation. Add it to your bookmarks! Family&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Important Judgment: Internal Relocation</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-internal-relocation/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-internal-relocation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWCA 1305]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I alerted you to the fact that a new judgment was due from the Court of Appeal which clarifies and updates the application of family law in internal relocation cases. The judgment is now published and we&#8217;ll be adding this to our library in the coming days and updating our guides on internal&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-internal-relocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law: Leave to Remove &#8211; Gender and Payne &#8211; Essential Reading</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-gender-and-payne-essential-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-gender-and-payne-essential-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 13:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(International Relocation Cases)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[882]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DF v N B-F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distress argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ewca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re F (A Child) (International Relocation Cases) [2015] EWCA Civ 882]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In August, Lord Justice Ryder handed down judgment in a case which involved leave to remove. In 2011, the court of appeal reviewed the relevance and application of guidance from the case Payne v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 166, also giving clarification as to whether the guidance in Payne was binding precedent. It is not,&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-gender-and-payne-essential-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
