<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; guidance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/guidance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Guidance on Expert Witnesses in Family Proceedings</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Assessent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice direction 25b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A guide has been announced today by Courts and Tribunal Judiciary for all stakeholders specific to the use of psychologists as expert witnesses. The guide provides discipline specific information in relation to regulation, codes of conduct, competencies, supervision/peer review and quality of service. The guide will be added to our Psychological Assessments page and can be&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failures in Judicial Case Allocation and Gatekeeping</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen a number of cases recently where the courts are failing to follow rules in relation to case allocation. Some of the worst examples include: leave to remove cases (where one parent seeks to remove the children abroad). complex cases previously heard in senior courts ending up heard by magistrates who fail to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAFCASS guidance on dealing with buggers</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafcass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drawn to our attention today in a tweet by Sarah Phillimore of www.childprotectionresource.org.uk is CAFCASS&#8217;s guidance on covert recording by parents. While the guidance isn&#8217;t new, it&#8217;s something worth reminding people of. The guidance is included in the CAFCASS Operating Framework (click to download). The guidance is set out between sections 2.26 to 2.31 of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave to Remove Guidance for the non-relocating parent</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ltr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the weekend I was asked what goes through my head (not the first time in the last week) when working on arguments in leave to remove cases. The question &#8220;are they very difficult to stop&#8221; raises the response &#8220;no, but you can&#8217;t hope to just walk into court without detailed preparation and get a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Society Guidance on dealing with Litigants-in-Person and Malpractice</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/law-society-guidance-on-dealing-with-litigants-in-person-and-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/law-society-guidance-on-dealing-with-litigants-in-person-and-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courtesy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Law Society has published guidance for solicitors on dealing with litigants-in-person. This, on the whole, is a welcome step forward. We experience and too often hear of three areas where solicitors&#8217; and barristers&#8217; conduct is unacceptable: The late filing of statements and other information; Late delivery and liaison regarding court bundles; Bullying the litigant-in-person&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/law-society-guidance-on-dealing-with-litigants-in-person-and-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
