<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; family court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/family-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Failings in Intractable Contact Cases Continue</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When intractable contact dispute cases fail to be resolved there are common reasons, and ones which involve how the cases are managed by the court and professionals involved in proceedings. Some of those cases are salvageable, while for others the long length of proceedings acts as a bar to the court entertaining a different approach.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Guidance for Local Courts on Transparency in Family Justice</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-for-local-courts-on-transparency-in-family-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-for-local-courts-on-transparency-in-family-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[published]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tranparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His Honour Judge Bellamy expresses his views on secrecy in the family courts and the campaign efforts to open proceedings to scrutiny. Within this, he also issues a practice note to the local court in Leicester, setting out considerations for the publishing of judgments. The main points of that guidance are listed below: The decision&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-for-local-courts-on-transparency-in-family-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poles apart: Midlands Non-Molestation and Residence Order data</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/poles-apart-midlands-non-molestation-and-residence-order-data/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/poles-apart-midlands-non-molestation-and-residence-order-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non Molestation Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non molestation orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non mols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we announced national statistics for non-molestation orders. Ministry of Justice (MoJ) supplied data indicates an explosion in applications in Birmingham&#8217;s County Court and Family Proceedings Court and it&#8217;s been the focus of a great deal of conversation. A reasonable question posed was &#8220;Would an increase in applications for family cases explain the increase&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/poles-apart-midlands-non-molestation-and-residence-order-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Minnock Case &#8211; Crime, Punishment and Compassion</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/the-minnock-case-crime-punishment-and-compassion/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/the-minnock-case-crime-punishment-and-compassion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minnock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The papers and social media are full of discussions on the mother who has abducted her child following residence having been awarded to the father. A number of questions have arisen which we want to comment on. Before we do, it&#8217;s worth noting that we support how the court has acted throughout from what has&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/the-minnock-case-crime-punishment-and-compassion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gender bias. Should it be a worry for those in court today?</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/gender-bias-should-it-be-a-worry-for-those-in-court-today/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/gender-bias-should-it-be-a-worry-for-those-in-court-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gender Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, I read John Bolch&#8217;s blog, where he disagrees with views that the family courts are biased against fathers. I&#8217;m going to be somewhat more cautious than John, and continue the exercise delving into why the perception of bias exists, whether there is justification for that belief, and whether other factors are involved which&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/gender-bias-should-it-be-a-worry-for-those-in-court-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
