<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/experts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation and Reform &#8211; Asking the Right Questions</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was pleasant to read Anthony Douglas, Chief Executive of CAFCASS, acknowledging that parental alienation was a form of child abuse in this week&#8217;s Telegraph. Pleasant&#8230; although being honest the main emotion was irritation, as I read an article which did little and said less. Catch up! Alienation is recognised&#8230; this isn&#8217;t news. If you&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal aid cuts, litigants-in-person, and exceptional funding</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpreter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K and H (Children: unrepresented father: cross-examination of child) [2015] EWFC 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants-in-person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q v Q; Re B; Re C [2014] EWFC 31]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court has been left with the unenviable task of finding solutions to the problem of cuts in legal aid. The court must act within the law, and while administering the law, meet its legal obligation to uphold an unrepresented party&#8217;s right to a fair hearing and respect for their family life. Those obligations derive&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
