<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>BBC Panorama &#8211; Problems for Litigants in Person</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/bbc-panorama-problems-for-litigants-in-person/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/bbc-panorama-problems-for-litigants-in-person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you missed the Panorama programme last night, you can still view it here. Is it news? Not really. The problems existed years ago for those who couldn&#8217;t afford a solicitor, and who didn&#8217;t qualify for legal aid. The difference today is simply there are more people affected following further cuts. Unlike the Government, whose&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/bbc-panorama-problems-for-litigants-in-person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal aid cuts, litigants-in-person, and exceptional funding</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 06:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interpreter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K and H (Children: unrepresented father: cross-examination of child) [2015] EWFC 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigants-in-person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q v Q; Re B; Re C [2014] EWFC 31]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[translation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court has been left with the unenviable task of finding solutions to the problem of cuts in legal aid. The court must act within the law, and while administering the law, meet its legal obligation to uphold an unrepresented party&#8217;s right to a fair hearing and respect for their family life. Those obligations derive&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/legal-aid-cuts-litigants-in-person-and-exceptional-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
