<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; contempt of court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/contempt-of-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Research and Media Requests &#8211; Things to Ponder</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is common in the family law arena/charity sector to get requests from the media or from students undertaking PhDs, asking for contact details for people who have been involved in family law proceedings for the purpose of news stories or research. On the whole, we do not involve ourselves with passing on details of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media: How to wreck your case</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 13:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s sadly too common to see people posting information about their cases online. Why is it sad? It carries an unnecessary risk, can damage their chances in court, and can later cause them considerable problems. There are other reasons but if these don&#8217;t hit home, others are probably unlikely to be heeded. Occasionally, we have&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
