<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; confidentiality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/confidentiality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Research and Media Requests &#8211; Things to Ponder</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secrecy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is common in the family law arena/charity sector to get requests from the media or from students undertaking PhDs, asking for contact details for people who have been involved in family law proceedings for the purpose of news stories or research. On the whole, we do not involve ourselves with passing on details of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/research-and-media-requests-things-to-ponder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media: How to wreck your case</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 13:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt of court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s sadly too common to see people posting information about their cases online. Why is it sad? It carries an unnecessary risk, can damage their chances in court, and can later cause them considerable problems. There are other reasons but if these don&#8217;t hit home, others are probably unlikely to be heeded. Occasionally, we have&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/social-media-how-to-wreck-your-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knowledge gaps among Legal Advisers in the Magistrates Court</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/knowledge-gaps-among-legal-advisers-in-the-magistrates-court/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/knowledge-gaps-among-legal-advisers-in-the-magistrates-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 16:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKenzie Friend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magistates court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckenzie friend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legal Advisers are responsible for giving legal advice to Magistrates in Magistrates&#8217; Courts throughout England and Wales. They are employed by Her Majesty&#8217;s Court and Tribunal Service. They help Magistrates to make decisions and state the legal reasons that underpin the decisions. They may also make judicial decisions to progress a case. In essence, for&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/knowledge-gaps-among-legal-advisers-in-the-magistrates-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
