<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; case law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/tag/case-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Family Law Week: Excellent Analysis of Internal Relocation Law</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Deborah Eaton QC and Stephen Jarmain, barrister, both of 1 King’s Bench Walk, explain the lessons to be learned from the important Court of Appeal judgment on internal relocation in which the authors represented the mother.&#8221; A must read for anyone who becomes involved in cases involving internal relocation. Add it to your bookmarks! Family&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/family-law-week-excellent-analysis-of-internal-relocation-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Important  Judgment &#8211; Re T (A Child) (Suspension of contact) (Section 91(14) CA 1989) [2015] EWCA Civ 719</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 91.14 Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension of Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s.91.14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 91.14 orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension of residence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important judgment and essential reading for those who assist litigants-in-person. The case provides learning points on: the making of section 91.14 orders, the issue of suspension of contact, the issue of the treatment of litigants-in-person (and represented parties) in respect of late filing of evidence by professionals and the other party, the issue of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Leave to Remove &#8211; N v N (Removal from the jurisdiction) [2015] EWFC B89</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-n-v-n-removal-from-the-jurisdiction-2015-ewfc-b89/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-n-v-n-removal-from-the-jurisdiction-2015-ewfc-b89/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devastated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distress argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWFC B89]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N v N]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstacles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mother´s having placed obstacles in the way of contact was a factor in leave to remove being refused. The mother&#8217;s arguments were unduly critical of the father and she could not think of a single positive thing to say about him. Her focus had been on the maternal family whereas it should have been&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-leave-to-remove-n-v-n-removal-from-the-jurisdiction-2015-ewfc-b89/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave to Remove Guidance for the non-relocating parent</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ltr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the weekend I was asked what goes through my head (not the first time in the last week) when working on arguments in leave to remove cases. The question &#8220;are they very difficult to stop&#8221; raises the response &#8220;no, but you can&#8217;t hope to just walk into court without detailed preparation and get a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/leave-to-remove-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you tried our guides? 1.5million words of content&#8230; free</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/have-you-tried-our-guides-1-5million-words-of-content-free/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/have-you-tried-our-guides-1-5million-words-of-content-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[england and wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The primary purpose of The Custody Minefield is to make family law accessible to separating parents in England and Wales. We&#8217;ve been doing this since 2006 when our first book The Custody Minefield was published. The Magistrates Magazine recommended it to &#8216;any separating parent&#8217; and the Divisional Chair of the British Association for Counseling and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/have-you-tried-our-guides-1-5million-words-of-content-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation &#8211; The Need for Consistency</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers of the court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wishes and feelings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Telegraph today ran an article on parental alienation headlined &#8220;We must stop turning children against divorced fathers&#8220;. It&#8217;s an area of interest for me, having worked on numerous cases where parental alienation was a factor, and having seen slow change in the courts on how parental alienation is considered and approached. People still say&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-the-need-for-consistency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC &#8211; Attitude, Behaviour and Child Focused &#8211; A case in point</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/abc-attitude-behaviour-and-child-focused-a-case-in-point/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/abc-attitude-behaviour-and-child-focused-a-case-in-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behaviour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child focused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWHC 2749]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC is so important when separated parents are seeking arrangements for their child&#8230; get that right, and regardless of the other parent&#8217;s position (albeit it helps), your prospects improve and your child will come out less damaged. In Re D (a child: private law proceedings) [2014] EWHC 2749 (Fam) we see a prime example of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/abc-attitude-behaviour-and-child-focused-a-case-in-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
