<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation and Reform &#8211; Asking the Right Questions</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was pleasant to read Anthony Douglas, Chief Executive of CAFCASS, acknowledging that parental alienation was a form of child abuse in this week&#8217;s Telegraph. Pleasant&#8230; although being honest the main emotion was irritation, as I read an article which did little and said less. Catch up! Alienation is recognised&#8230; this isn&#8217;t news. If you&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brexit &#8211; Family Law Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first thoughts on Brexit news today was sympathy for parents whose children have been removed to other European countries following leave to remove decisions. The decision last night will be causing them uncertainty and anxiety. One of the the best EU regulations from a family law perspective  (or bureaucracy that was forced upon us&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parenting Stereotypes and Alienation</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Assessent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shared Living Arrangements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Jennifer Hardman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereotypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A powerful talk by Dr Jennifer Hardman on parenting stereotypes and alienation, given at an independently organised TED talks event. Dr. Harman is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Colorado State University and is the Program Coordinator for the Applied Social &#38; Health Psychology Program. A number of interesting features for me. Parenting stereotypes; The&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parenting-stereotypes-and-alienation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Guidance on Psychologist Experts &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-on-psychologist-experts-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-on-psychologist-experts-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 00:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Assessent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rarely I write two articles on a single subject in one day (and certainly not this late at night). However, I&#8217;m genuinely enthused about this latest initiative by the Family Justice Council and British Psychological Society. It&#8217;s a matter I&#8217;ve been talking and writing about for the past two years. Last year, I worked with&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-guidance-on-psychologist-experts-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance on Expert Witnesses in Family Proceedings</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Assessent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice direction 25b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A guide has been announced today by Courts and Tribunal Judiciary for all stakeholders specific to the use of psychologists as expert witnesses. The guide provides discipline specific information in relation to regulation, codes of conduct, competencies, supervision/peer review and quality of service. The guide will be added to our Psychological Assessments page and can be&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/guidance-on-expert-witnesses-in-family-proceedings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karen Woodall &#8211; BACP Sanction Compliance Notice Published</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/karen-woodall-bacp-sanction-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/karen-woodall-bacp-sanction-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 20:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woodall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We make this announcement following an invitation from Karen Woodall&#8217;s solicitors to announce details of her compliance with the sanction made against her by the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy. The details of the hearing, decision and sanction were published by the BACP in July 2015 with the decision of the Panel being &#8220;Accordingly,&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/karen-woodall-bacp-sanction-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help: Non Molestation Orders and Without Notice Applications</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/non-mol-without-notice-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/non-mol-without-notice-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ex Parte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non Molestation Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Without Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injunctive orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irregularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non molestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-mol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data from a Freedom of Information Act request for non-molestation order applications (in 2014) shows that of the 21,162 applications (included in the statistical returns) a little over 60% were made &#8216;without notice&#8217; (12,769 applications). Without Notice applications to the court involving claims of domestic violence often result in injunctive orders being made without the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/non-mol-without-notice-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New interim regulations related to domestic violence and evidence for legal aid</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-interim-regulations-related-to-domestic-violence-and-evidence-for-legal-aid/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-interim-regulations-related-to-domestic-violence-and-evidence-for-legal-aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[april 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fmg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[may 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence is required to help secure legal aid funding for victims of domestic violence in private family proceedings. Interim changes are currently being introduced to regulations which relate to this evidence, pending a final decision by the Government (so there may be further changes). These interim regulations include: The time limit for the validity of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-interim-regulations-related-to-domestic-violence-and-evidence-for-legal-aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts don&#8217;t deal with perjury or enforce contact?</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reversal of Residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelmsford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CM15P00735]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w v g]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W v G [2015] EW Misc B47 (CC) It is unusual to see judgments published by the County Court so this case may have escaped you (it did me and thank you to the person who tipped me off yesterday). The case concerns an intractable contact dispute made more complex by the subject children having&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MAAPP &#8211; The Multidisciplinary Agency App for Social Workers</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/maapp-the-multidisciplinary-agency-app-for-social-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/maapp-the-multidisciplinary-agency-app-for-social-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an age when resources and support are cut as a result of austerity, we welcome work done by individuals and organisations to help share information and best practice to improve outcomes for children. An underlying goal for us has been to put family law at people&#8217;s fingertips and empower others. MAAPP, the Multidisciplinary Agency&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/maapp-the-multidisciplinary-agency-app-for-social-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
