<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; Suspension of Contact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/category/suspension-of-contact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Case Law: Successful appeal of refusal of supervised contact</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-successful-appeal-of-refusal-of-supervised-contact/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-successful-appeal-of-refusal-of-supervised-contact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension of Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indirect contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supervised Contact]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Re S (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 689 The father sought an order for direct supervised contact but this was refused. The principle part of the appeal related to the judgment having departed from the CAFCASS recommendation of supervised contact and the lack of reasoning given to explain why. The father&#8217;s appeal was successful and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-case-law-successful-appeal-of-refusal-of-supervised-contact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Important  Judgment &#8211; Re T (A Child) (Suspension of contact) (Section 91(14) CA 1989) [2015] EWCA Civ 719</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 91.14 Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suspension of Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s.91.14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 91.14 orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspension of residence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important judgment and essential reading for those who assist litigants-in-person. The case provides learning points on: the making of section 91.14 orders, the issue of suspension of contact, the issue of the treatment of litigants-in-person (and represented parties) in respect of late filing of evidence by professionals and the other party, the issue of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/important-judgment-re-t-a-child-suspension-of-contact-section-9114-ca-1989-2015-ewca-civ-719/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
