<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; Older Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/category/older-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re C (Older Children: Relocation) [2015] EWCA Civ 1298</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Older Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(Older Children: Relocation)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civ 1298]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case related to an application for leave to remove in respect of two teenagers. One being under 16, the other aged 17. The appellate court refused appeal against the recorder´s decision to refuse leave to remove in respect of the younger teen, despite their expressing their wish to relocate. The underlying reason was that&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/re-c-older-children-relocation-2015-ewca-civ-1298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
