<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; International Child Abduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/category/international-child-abduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Brexit &#8211; Family Law Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first thoughts on Brexit news today was sympathy for parents whose children have been removed to other European countries following leave to remove decisions. The decision last night will be causing them uncertainty and anxiety. One of the the best EU regulations from a family law perspective  (or bureaucracy that was forced upon us&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lobbying for legal aid, but silence for those most in need</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lobbying-for-legal-aid-but-silence-for-those-most-at-need/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lobbying-for-legal-aid-but-silence-for-those-most-at-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s continued discussion on social media and legal media about lobbying to reverse cuts to legal aid. Today&#8217;s quote was the Chairman of the Bar saying “We believe access to justice is a fundamental part of the rule of law and are doing all we can to help limit the impact upon those who find&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/lobbying-for-legal-aid-but-silence-for-those-most-at-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New US Data on Child Abduction and International Non-Compliance</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-us-data-on-child-abduction-and-international-non-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-us-data-on-child-abduction-and-international-non-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 18:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980 Hague Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAPRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-conpliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department of State Bureau for Consular Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of interest to those involved in cases involving international child abduction, the unlawful retention of children abroad, applications for leave to remove, and applications for temporary leave to remove, comes new data from the United States on state non-compliance in respect of the children&#8217;s return. The 2015 report from the US Department of State Bureau&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/new-us-data-on-child-abduction-and-international-non-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
