<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; Enforcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/category/enforcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Brexit &#8211; Family Law Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Child Abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child abduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relocation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first thoughts on Brexit news today was sympathy for parents whose children have been removed to other European countries following leave to remove decisions. The decision last night will be causing them uncertainty and anxiety. One of the the best EU regulations from a family law perspective  (or bureaucracy that was forced upon us&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/brexit-family-law-perspectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts don&#8217;t deal with perjury or enforce contact?</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reversal of Residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelmsford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CM15P00735]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w v g]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W v G [2015] EW Misc B47 (CC) It is unusual to see judgments published by the County Court so this case may have escaped you (it did me and thank you to the person who tipped me off yesterday). The case concerns an intractable contact dispute made more complex by the subject children having&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/courts-dont-deal-with-perjury-or-enforce-contact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposals for the Reform of Intractable Contact Dispute Law</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families Need Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable contact dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice direction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir james munby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the custody minefield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last September I had the opportunity to write a paper on the reform of private family law and specifically related to contact enforcement. The paper was presented to Sir James Munby, President of the Family Court, by officers of Families Need Fathers who had been offered a continuing dialogue by him following his presentation to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/proposals-for-the-reform-of-intractable-contact-dispute-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failings in Intractable Contact Cases Continue</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When intractable contact dispute cases fail to be resolved there are common reasons, and ones which involve how the cases are managed by the court and professionals involved in proceedings. Some of those cases are salvageable, while for others the long length of proceedings acts as a bar to the court entertaining a different approach.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failures in Judicial Case Allocation and Gatekeeping</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave to Remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave to remove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have seen a number of cases recently where the courts are failing to follow rules in relation to case allocation. Some of the worst examples include: leave to remove cases (where one parent seeks to remove the children abroad). complex cases previously heard in senior courts ending up heard by magistrates who fail to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failures-judicial-case-allocation-and-gatekeeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
