<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Custody Minefield &#187; CAFCASS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecustodyminefield.com/category/cafcass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 09:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Parental Alienation and Reform &#8211; Asking the Right Questions</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was pleasant to read Anthony Douglas, Chief Executive of CAFCASS, acknowledging that parental alienation was a form of child abuse in this week&#8217;s Telegraph. Pleasant&#8230; although being honest the main emotion was irritation, as I read an article which did little and said less. Catch up! Alienation is recognised&#8230; this isn&#8217;t news. If you&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/parental-alienation-and-reform-asking-the-right-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failings in Intractable Contact Cases Continue</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intractable Contact Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigants-in-Person]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intractable disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental alienation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When intractable contact dispute cases fail to be resolved there are common reasons, and ones which involve how the cases are managed by the court and professionals involved in proceedings. Some of those cases are salvageable, while for others the long length of proceedings acts as a bar to the court entertaining a different approach.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/failings-in-intractable-contact-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAFCASS guidance on dealing with buggers</title>
		<link>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/</link>
		<comments>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelRobinson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAFCASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafcass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecustodyminefield.com/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drawn to our attention today in a tweet by Sarah Phillimore of www.childprotectionresource.org.uk is CAFCASS&#8217;s guidance on covert recording by parents. While the guidance isn&#8217;t new, it&#8217;s something worth reminding people of. The guidance is included in the CAFCASS Operating Framework (click to download). The guidance is set out between sections 2.26 to 2.31 of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thecustodyminefield.com/cafcass-guidance-on-dealing-with-buggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
